Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Overconsumption must be addressed to solve climate crisis

Over-consumption and affluence need to be addressed to solve the climate crisis, according to a new report that was published today (June 19). 

In the report, a team of international researchers, including scientists at the University of Leeds, have highlighted the danger of growth-oriented economies and the pursuit of affluence when it comes to the climate crisis.

The researchers have said that ‘green or sustainable growth’ is a myth and technology will not be able to keep up with the increasing environmental impacts caused by economic and population growth.

According to the report, the world’s most affluent citizens are responsible for most environmental impacts and are therefore central to any future prospect of retreating to safer conditions. However, the scientists have highlighted that responsibility for change doesn’t just sit with individuals and that broader structural and economic changes are needed.

Co-author Julia Steinberger, professor of ecological economics in the School of Earth and Environment at Leeds, said: ‘To protect ourselves from the worsening climate crisis, we must reduce inequality and challenge the notion that riches, and those who possess them, are inherently good.

‘In the UK, we see that our government’s fixation on economic growth is continually standing in the way of effective action on existential threats, from the climate crisis to the coronavirus pandemic.

‘The benefits of focusing on well-being and bolstering social programmes is supported by extensive research. A shift to well-being economics is long overdue – indeed Scotland and Wales have already joined the Wellbeing Economy Alliance.’

Lead author of the study, Professor Tommy Wiedmann from the University of New South Wales, Australia added: ‘The key conclusion from our review is that we cannot rely on technology alone to solve existential environmental problems – like climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution – but that we also have to change our affluent lifestyles and reduce overconsumption, in combination with structural change.’

Photo Credit – Pixabay

Pippa Neill
Reporter.
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top