Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Glasgow LEZ hangs in balance following judicial review

The Low Emission Zone in Scotland’s largest city has undergone a ‘substantive hearing’ to ascertain its effectiveness and legality. 

a truck driving down a street next to tall buildings

Designed to take the most polluting vehicles off roads and in turn bring air pollution down, the scheme came into operation in June this year, leaving opinion divided on its merits. 

Anti-LEZ campaigners have presented evidence including air quality studies which indicate Glasgow’s targets on clean air have already been met. However, Glasgow City Council has pointed to illegal nitrogen dioxide levels in the area as a key cause for concern, a noxious gas linked to a number of serious health complications. A judicial heating began on Tuesday 17th October and concluded the following day, in which it cases were presented for and against the continuation of the scheme.

‘When looking at proportionality overall, this court ought to give due weight to the decision of a democratic and publicly accountable local authority when considering whether or not a fair balance has been struck as between the public interest with a legitimate aim on one side and the impact on the person whose rights are said to have been infringed,’ said Ruth Crawford KC, acting on behalf of Glasgow City Council. 

A decision will be given by Judge Lady Poole at a later date. 

The Scottish Government currently has LEZs planned for Aberdeen, Dundee and Edinburgh, all of which are set to come into effect next year and are likely to meet similar opposition. Across the UK, air quality regulations have been widely criticised for failing to update in line with World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended limits. Meanwhile, experts frequently argue that regulations fail to support the idea that no amount of air pollution is ‘safe’, with greenhouse and other toxic gases in the air directly contributing to health problems in local populations. 

More on emissions: 

Emissions monitoring tech needed for ‘North Sea roadmap’

 

Images: Giorgio Trovato

Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis