Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Gap between biodiversity funding and future needs widens to $942bn

The latest BloombergNEF Biodiversity Finance Factbook paints a stark picture of investment shortfalls, with urgency growing. 

Investment in biodiversity projects is failing to keep up with inflation, with just $208billion currently flowing through the sector globally each year. According to analysis, by 2030 financing will need to be eight times that figure to meet predicted needs, or $1.15trillion. 

Public finance is one of the biggest driver of biodiversity conservation, accounting for well over half – $164billion – in total finance, rising $17.2billion year-on-year. Overseas development assistance and debt-for-nature swaps are two of the most common forms of this type of finance. 

By comparison, private investment is actually falling, with a 53% decline in nature-based carbon offsets sine 2021. Adding to the mounting pressure, recent research has shown that most financial institutions are not effectively preparing for nature-related risks, with just 7.5% revealing they had executive-level insight in tbis area. 

‘While financial investment into nature has risen since the Global Biodiversity Framework established in December 2022, it is still not on track to hit the 2030 targets agreed in Montreal. Currently, an estimated $942 billion is needed to meet the funding shortfall.
This a difficult challenge, but not impossible,’ said Hugh Bromley, Head of Food, Agriculture and Nature Research at BloombergNEF.

Funding must prioritize the most biodiverse, valuable and threatened biomes across the developing world, with BNEF identifying Brazil as the top priority,’ he continued. ‘This must be driven by both public and private finance – from debt-for-nature swaps to green and sustainable bonds and carbon offset issuance, among other tools. The next six years will be critical for the preservation and restoration the world’s nature systems.’

More on climate change and net zero:

Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top