Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Reaching net-zero could cost as little as 0.2% of GDP, new study suggests

Rebuilding the U.S energy system to run primarily on renewable energy would cost about $1 per person, according to researchers at the Berkeley National Laboratory. 

The researchers created a detailed model of the entire U.S energy and industrial system in order to produce the first detailed, peer-reviewed study outlining how to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050.

They developed multiple feasible technology pathways that differed widely in terms of fossil fuel use, land use and consumer adoption.

The pathways studied had net-costs ranging from 0.2% to 1.2% of GDP, with higher costs resulting from certain tradeoffs, such as limiting the amount of land given to solar and wind farm.

The scenarios were generated using new energy models complete with details of both energy consumption and production, such as the entire U.S building stock, vehicle fleet, power plants and more.

The researchers have highlighted that the cost would be lower still if they included the economic and climate benefits that decarbonising our energy systems will bring. For example, less reliance on oil will mean less money spent on oil and less economic uncertainty due to oil price fluctations and this could lead to the avoidance of climate related disasters.

Margaret Torn, lead author of the study, said: ‘The decarbonization of the U.S. energy system is fundamentally an infrastructure transformation.

‘It means that by 2050 we need to build many gigawatts of wind and solar power plants, new transmission lines, a fleet of electric cars and light trucks, millions of heat pumps to replace conventional furnaces and water heaters, and more energy-efficient buildings –while continuing to research and innovate new technologies.

‘In this transition, very little infrastructure would need “early retirement,” or replacement before the end of its economic life. No one is asking consumers to switch out their brand-new car for an electric vehicle. The point is that efficient, low-carbon technologies need to be used when it comes time to replace the current equipment.’

Photo Credit – Pixabay

Pippa Neill
Reporter.
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top