Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Government must move away from biofuel, says new campaign

New campaign launched by environmental advocacy groups aims to shed light on the UK’s subsidies to companies that burn trees for electricity. 

The UK is the largest user of biomass electricity in Europe, backed by more than £1bn a year in government subsidies.

According to the Cut Carbon Not Forests campaign, burning wood in power stations is no better for the climate than burning coal, especially as much of the wood is cut down and shipped in from sensitive forests overseas, causing damages to wildlife and habitats.

The campaign, which is led by Biofuelwatch, Dogwood Alliance, Natural Resources Defence Council (NRDC) and the Southern Environmental Law Center, aims to put pressure on policymakers to support reform away from biomass. They are calling on the government to redirect the billions of pounds used for biofuel to fund genuinely clean and renewable energy systems like solar and wind.

According to the campaign, the British public opinion aligns with a push towards biomass subsidy reform. YouGov found 82% of respondents were worried about the impact on wildlife if trees in forests were being cut down to supply power plants.

Almuth Ernsting, co-director of Biofuelwatch said: ‘The climate emergency requires us to build a genuinely clean-energy economy and end wasteful subsidies for dirty biomass energy.

‘Cutting down trees, shipping them from forests overseas and burning them in power plants was never compatible with the need to keep global warming to 1.5 degrees; that’s even clearer today. It’s long past time to redirect this aid to genuine climate solutions like wind and solar energy.’

Sasha Stashwick, a senior advocate with NRDC added: ‘Our two biggest global environmental challenges – climate change and biodiversity loss – are inextricably linked, so keeping forests standing must be a priority of all governments.

‘Much of the wood burned in UK power plants is cut down and shipped in from ecologically sensitive forests in the Southeastern U.S. Those forests are efficient and powerful carbon-capture systems and support unique wildlife found nowhere else in the world.’

Photo Credit – Pixabay

 

Pippa Neill
Reporter.
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top