Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Smarter web design could slash YouTube’s carbon footprint

YouTube uses around 10Mt CO2e (Million Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent) a year, the same as a city the size of Glasgow, but smarter web design could cut that figure significantly, researchers have argued.

In a first-of-its-kind study, researchers from the University of Bristol looked at how much electric energy was used to provide YouTube videos to people globally in 2016, which enabled them to estimate the service’s carbon footprint, with carbon emissions resulting from servers who have to stream over 1 billion hours of video to devices all over the world each day.

They then looked at what reductions could be gained by eliminating one example of ‘digital waste’, such as sending images to users who are only using YouTube to listen to audio.

They believe that by tweaking the design, it could reduce YouTube’s footprint by between 100-500Kt CO2e annually, the carbon footprint of around 30,000 UK homes.

The researchers also revealed that current standards used by companies to report carbon emissions do not ‘adequately account’ for the whole footprint of such digital services, and argued that they should be expanded to do so.

These include emissions associated with the delivery of physical goods (e.g. by lorry) but do not include emissions associated with the delivery of digital services over the internet and mobile networks.

Lead researcher Professor Chris Priest said: ‘People are aware of the significant amount of energy use of data centres and corporations are increasingly aware of the need to change their practices in light of the challenges that climate change present to humanity and the global ecosystem,

‘But for a streaming service such as YouTube, most of the energy is used in the network, particularly the mobile network.

‘Given the overall size of the carbon footprint of such services, it is important that companies assess and report them. By doing so, they can identify the carbon savings that can be made by alternative design decisions, and hopefully find ways to reduce their overall footprint.’

Dr Dan Schien, the lead designer of the modelling toolkit they developed for their YouTube research, added they are now working with the BBC to understand their carbon footprint as they move further towards streaming services such as the BBC iPlayer.

Read the study here.

Thomas Barrett
Senior journalist - NewStart Follow him on Twitter
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top