Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Net-zero by 2050 is impossible unless government takes action, says new report

In a report published today (January 30) by the think tank Green Alliance, it is stated that the current net-zero goals are impossible to achieve unless the government takes serious action to cut energy use. 

In June 2019, the UK became the first major government to pass a law outlining plans to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

However, according to Green Alliance, the government is failing to match these ambitions and unless serious changes are made then achieving this goal is impossible.

The authors of the report suggest that the government must focus on the energy supply in the three key sectors of transport, building and industry, rather than just focusing on individual reductions in emissions.

Transport has the highest emissions of any sector, which according to Green Alliance is largely due to the increase in the numbers of passenger cars, around 15% more than in 2001.

The researchers highlight that although improving technology such as electric cars is important, it is also important for the government to prioritise getting people out of their cars, by encouraging them to choose active travel or public transport instead.

The emissions produced from buildings is another sector which according to the report has not been paid enough attention, the report suggests that the government needs to introduce new incentives for those who are able to retrofit and improve their homes, but that they also need to allocate an additional £1bn per year to help retrofit low-income households.

The report also outlines that by tackling emissions from industry, it could lead to carbon savings that are 3-4 times greater than those envisaged for energy efficiency by 2050.

Based on research by CREDS, which is a collaboration of leading academics from 15 UK universities, the study concludes that all government departments need to address energy demand on these three fronts:

  1. Avoid unnecessary energy use
  2. Improve technical energy efficiency
  3. Flex energy demand, such as ‘time-of-use’ tariffs

Professor Nick Eyre, CREDS director said: ‘Going to the effort of decarbonising all the energy we currently use is not a sensible strategy to bring about a sustainable energy system unless we also take steps to cut demand.

‘This needs to be a dominant part of the energy system change.’

Libby Peake, head of resource policy at Green Alliance, said: ‘The government’s approach to energy is self-defeating.

‘It ignores half of the equation and denies people considerable benefits.

‘Not only would reducing demand help to reach carbon reduction targets earlier, but it would also reduce infrastructure costs and benefit everyone – through cleaner air, more comfortable homes and healthier lives.’

Photo Credit – Pixabay

Pippa Neill
Reporter.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top