We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Carbon offsets from world leading provider Verra are ‘largely worthless’ and do not effectively prevent deforestation, a new investigation has found.
Carried out by the Guardian, German newspaper Die Zeit and non-profit investigative journalism organisation SourceMaterial, the investigation revealed that over 90% of Verra’s rainforest offset credits do not result in real carbon reductions.
Multiple big businesses, such as Disney, Gucci and easyJet, buy carbon offsets from Verra, allowing them to claim their products are ‘carbon neutral’ or unharmful to the planet.
The carbon offsets market is growing and reached a value of $2 billion in 2021, but doubts have remained on the environmental impact of climate offsets projects which have been compounded by this report.
Three studies which used satellite images to track the results of offsetting projects were analysed as part of the investigation.
Two of these found that only eight out of 29 projects supported by Verra made a considerable impact on deforestation reduction, with further analysis by the investigative team finding that 94% of credits for the projects should not have been approved.
Baseline forests loss scenarios have also been revealed to be hugely overstated by 400%, with all three pieces of research concluding that Verra’s projects are largely ineffective.
Verra produced a lengthy statement in response, saying it is ‘disappointed’ by the claims and disputing the fact that it has over-issued carbon credits.
The company said the studies do not accurately assess the impact of its projects, as they don’t consider ‘site-specific drivers of deforestation’ and rely on ‘synthetic controls that do not accurately represent the pre-project conditions.’
Verra also said it was now re-assessing project baselines every six years to account for unpredictable local changes to deforestation and was working to transition all projects to one form of methodology to ‘ensure consistency in emission reductions within a set region.’
However, Barbara Haya, Director of the Berkeley Carbon Trading Project told the Guardian that ‘the offset market is broken’, explaining that these issues are prevalent with every type of carbon credit.
Photo by John Modaff