Nuclear Free Local Authorities and the environmental group Possible have issued an open letter urging policy makers to bring forward new onshore wind projects and abandon ‘expensive’, ‘slow’ and ‘risky’ nuclear plans.
To mark Global Wind Day – 15th June 2022 – two UK organisations have joined forces to issue a plea for government to rethink priorities in the scramble for greater energy security and the transition to net zero.
Nuclear Free Local Authorities has teamed up with the environmental group Possible, which aims to create a level playing field for onshore wind. Both bodies claim this option offers the cheapest, cleanest, and most immediate form of energy Britain could bring online, and can have a significant positive impact on a population currently struggling with spiralling household bills.
‘Given that onshore wind is a proven, relatively cheap, green and sustainable power source, and, contrary to the myths peddled by certain sections of our national press, very popular with all sections of the public, it is the contention of the NFLA that the government should be doing much more to bring forward many more onshore wind developments by relaxing the onerous planning regulations, by encouraging communities to invest in such developments,’ said NFLA Steering Committee Chair, Cllr David Blackburn. ‘There really is no excuse for the government to ‘unlock’ onshore wind to help achieve net zero.’
The open letter confirms both NFLA and Possible consider the nuclear power option as ‘too expensive, too slow… always accompanied by operational risks, can be a target for hostile military forces or terrorists, is reliant on foreign uranium, and generates a deadly legacy of toxic radioactive waste’. The latter is a particularly relevant given current plans to conduct a month-long series of seismic tests to assess the feasibility of constructing an undersea storage facility for nuclear waste off the coast of Cumbria. You can read Environment Journal‘s in-depth investigative report on the short and long term impact here.
The letter makes a number of recommendations: