Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Nine-hour working week may be necessary to avert climate disaster

The UK may need to drastically reduce its working hours to avoid a climate disaster, a study has concluded.

The study, conducted by thinktank Autonomy, found that workers in the UK, Sweden and Germany may all need to reduce their work to less than ten hours a week per person to limit global warming just to around 2C, given current productivity levels.

The study, based on UN and OECD data on carbon productivity per industry sector in the three countries, also found that reducing working hours would not be enough to tackle the climate crisis by itself, as it concluded that a drastic economic shift will also be needed.

‘Working time reduction as an isolated policy by itself will likely be insufficient to combat climate change,’ the study says.

‘Rather, it needs to be supplemented by other policies facilitating radical economic transformation, for instance to shift jobs from sectors such as manufacturing and fossil fuel extraction towards employment in service professions and green jobs (e.g. reforestation operations).’

The paper assumes an ‘absolute’ decrease in working time by those currently working, with jobs not being offered to the unemployed or extra hours being offered to the underemployed.

However, it does not factor in the other possible environmental benefits of reducing working hours such as a drop in commuting levels and fewer goods being produced.

The author of the study, Philipp Frey, said that given the scale of the climate crisis reducing working hours is not just but a necessity.

‘If ecological sustainability requires an overall decrease in material consumption, a vast expansion in terms of leisure time and thus an increase in “time prosperity” would be less of a luxury and more of an urgency,’ he said.

The report comes as the idea of a ‘Green New Deal’ gains traction in the US and Europe, which focusing on decarbonisation of the economy to give workers well-paid, sustainable jobs.

Growing levels of automation in the workplace have also led to calls for the working week – on average around 40 hours in the UK – to be reduced.

Advocates for a shorter working week say that it would lead to improved wellbeing, increased productivity and better gender equality, as well as helping to tackle the climate emergency.

Image credit: Ana Gic from Pixabay 

Chris Ogden
Digital News Reporter
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top