Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Microplastics found in iconic US rivers

Microplastics found in 100% of the samples taken from 50 iconic rivers, lakes and streams in Pennsylvania, according to a new study published by researchers at PennEnvironment Research & Policy Center. 

To better understand the scope of the microplastic problem in the U.S, the researchers took samples from these waterways over the course of 2020 and tested them for four types of microplastic pollution.

In the samples they found:

  1. Fibres, primarily from clothing and textiles.
  2. Fragments, primarily from harder plastics or plastic feedstock.
  3. Film, primarily from bags and flexible plastic packaging.
  4. Beads, primarily from facial scrubs and other cosmetic products.

The researchers highlighted that although many of the waterways sampled had no visual litter at the point of access and have dedicated organisations working to clear up rubbish, it is clear that the scope of plastic pollution extends far beyond what was previously thought.

Dave Noble, a spokesperson at Bluewater, a Swedish water company battling the need for single-use plastic water bottles commented on these findings: ‘Unlike litter, micro and nano plastics are largely invisible to the naked eye yet today are in the food we eat, the air we breathe, and the water we all drink around the world, so perhaps it’s not so surprising that people are largely unaware of what’s going on.

‘The evidence from China, the USA, and Europe about microplastics pollution in treated tap and bottled water sends a stark warning to us all that we need bolder action on a massive scale and at speed by regulators and lawmakers to halt plastics and chemicals ending up in our tap water.’

In related news, researchers at the Endocrine Society found that plastics contain and leach endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), which can cause cancer, diabetes and reproductive disorders.

Photo Credit – Pixabay

Pippa Neill
Reporter.
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top