Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Methane emissions may have been underestimated by up to 90%

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is underestimating methane emissions from oil and gas production according to new research published in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 

In order to measure methane emissions in the U.S, researchers at the Harvard School of Engineering developed a new method to trace and map total emissions from satellite data to their source on the ground.

Using this model, the researchers were able to trace the path of emissions from the atmosphere back to the ground and identify areas where the observations and simulations didn’t match up.

The biggest discrepancy was in emissions from oil and natural gas production.

They found that emissions from oil and gas production were 90%  and 50% higher respectively than the EPA estimated in its latest inventory.

The EPA calculates emission based on processes and equipment. For example, they estimate that a gas pump emits a certain amount of methane, multiplies that by how many pumps are operating across the country and estimates total emissions from gas pumps.

The researchers hope that future work will provide more clarity on exactly where these emissions are coming from and how they are changing.

Joannes Maasakkers, a former graduate student who developed this method said: ‘When we look at emissions from space, we can only see how total emissions from an area should be scaled up or down, but we don’t know the source responsible for those emissions.

‘Because we spent so much time with the EPA figuring out where these different emissions occur, we could use our transport model to go back and figure out what sources are responsible for those under- or over-estimations in the national total.

‘We plan to continue to monitor U.S. emissions of methane using new high-resolution satellite observations, and to work with the EPA to improve emission inventories.

‘It’s important to understand these emissions better but we shouldn’t wait until we fully understand these emissions to start trying to reduce them. There are already a lot of things that we know we can do to reduce emissions.’

Photo Credit – Pixabay

Pippa Neill
Reporter.
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top