Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Lithium-ion cheapest way to store electricity ‘by 2050’

Lithium-ion batteries will be the cheapest way to store electricity by 2050, according to a new study.

The new research, published this week in Joule by researchers at Imperial College London, calculates the future cost of storing energy with different technologies, including large-scale batteries and pumped-storage hydroelectricity.

Their findings revealed that lithium-ion has the lowest ‘levelized cost of storage’ – which is the full costs of storing energy including investment, operation and charging cost, as well as technology lifetime, efficiency and performance degradation.

Lead researcher Oliver Schmidt, from the Grantham Institute and the Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial, said: ‘Our model is the first to project full energy storage costs into the future, allowing predictions of which technology will be most competitive in a particular application at a particular time.’

Their model shows that at present, the cheapest energy storage mechanism is pumped-storage hydroelectricity, where water is pumped to a higher elevation with spare energy, then released to harvest the energy when needed.

However, as time progresses, pumped-storage hydroelectricity costs do not decrease, whereas lithium-ion battery costs come down, making them the cheapest options for most applications from 2030.

Schmidt added: ‘Our projections show that lithium-ion technologies will see a rapid decline in costs over the next couple of decades. This is driven mainly by the fact that lithium-ion is manufactured at scale.

‘The resulting reduction in initial investment costs is more significant than for other newer technologies such as flow batteries and flywheels, potentially outcompeting any performance advantages of these newer technologies.’

Dr Iain Staffell, senior author on the paper from the Centre from Environmental Policy, said: ‘We have found that lithium-ion batteries are following in the footsteps of crystalline silicon solar panels.

‘First-generation solar cells were high performance but very expensive, so cheaper second- and third-generation designs were developed to supersede them. However, sheer economies of scale mean these first-generation panels now cannot be beaten on price.’

The team at Imperial College have made their model open access, allowing consumers, academics, industry and policymakers to run their own simulations with the data for specific applications.

Thomas Barrett
Senior journalist - NewStart Follow him on Twitter
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis