Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

ClientEarth sues over the climate impact of European Central Bank policy

ClientEarth has filed legal action to stop ‘quantitative easing’ from European central banks to fossil fuel companies and polluting firms. 

The action challenges a programme developed by the European Central Bank (ECB) and implemented by the central banks of Belgium, Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Finland.

Currently €266 billion worth of corporate bonds are held under the programme, and research suggests that well over half of those bonds have been issued by companies in carbon-intensive sectors.

ClientEarth’s lawsuit against Belgium’s central bank asks for a question to be referred to the EU’s top court.

That question would ask the court to decide whether the ECB’s purchase programme is valid or invalid, in order to determine whether the Belgian National Bank’s actions carried out under that policy are legal.

If found to be invalid, ClientEarth asks the court to order the Belgian central bank to stop purchasing bonds under the programme. The ECB would have to take all measures appropriate to remedy the illegality.

ClientEarth lawyer Jamie Sawyer said: ‘By buying up carbon-intensive bonds, the Belgian National Bank is providing some of Europe’s worst polluters with access to cheap finance and facilitating the expansion of their climate-damaging activities.

‘Central banks in the EU are legally obliged to contribute to the protection of our environment and respect human rights, but instead, they are directing capital into sectors that contribute the most to climate change. This flies in the face of the bloc’s commitments to mitigate the climate crisis and drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

‘The ECB needs to stop using the myth of ‘market neutrality’ to justify purchasing assets of climate-wrecking companies and must take immediate action to align its monetary policy with the goals of the Paris Agreement.

‘We urge the ECB’s Executive Board and Governing Council not to waste the significant opportunity provided by the strategy review to ensure the central bank’s purchasing programme works to mitigate climate change, rather than contribute to it.’

Photo Credit – Pixabay

Pippa Neill
Reporter.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis