Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement
Editor's Pick

88% of global banks unprepared for climate disruption

A first-of-its-kind system has ranked the world’s 50 largest banks on readiness for a changing climate. The results aren’t good. 

Almost all large commercial banks are lagging behind on implementing effective measures to climate-proof their operations and those they finance. Only seven of the world’s biggest firms in the sector were met more than half of climate adaptation criteria. None complied with all. 

The report, The Top 50 Banks in the World Tackling Adaptation (2024), was compiled by Climate X, a leading firm in environmental risk data analysis. Produced in collaboration with Climate Proof, according the first-of-its-kind ranking system, European banks are leading in this area. 

Four of the worst performing banks – Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Capital One Financial Corp., and U.S. Bancorp, were all US based. Also in the bottom five was Japanese institution, Japan Post Bank. 

Standard Chartered PLC (UK), Banco Santander SA (Spain), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (Spain), UniCredit SpA (Italy), and Sberbank of Russia (Russia) were the best performers. 

Banks were ranked on 17 qualitative indicators, grouped into three categories: ‘think’ – strategic alignment and assessment of physical climate risks, ‘do’ – implementation of adaptation measures and strategies, and ‘track’ – monitoring, reporting, and transparency of adaptation actions.

‘With this inaugural annual ranking, we hope to shine a light on the gaps in the financial sector’s preparedness for climate risks,’ said Lukky Ahmed. ‘Our message to banks is clear: now is the time to act. The longer they wait, the more severe the consequences will be, not just for them, but for the entire economy.’

‘Despite the growing urgency, the study shows a significant gap in how banks address climate adaptation,’ the continued. ‘Climate adaptation is no longer a choice for the financial sector – it’s a necessity. Our ranking demonstrates that while some banks are beginning to take steps to prepare for a hotter, more volatile world, the majority have a long way to go. It is vital that banks incorporate adaptation into their strategic decision-making processes and develop products and services that support resilience.’

The top 50 global banks ranked in order of climate adaptation maturity: 

Bank Country

 

Think Indicators Do Indicators Track Indicators Total Indicators Rank
Standard Chartered PLC UK 6 4 2 12 1
Banco Santander SA Spain 5 4 2 11 2
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA Spain 4 4 2 10 3
UniCredit SpA Italy 4 4 1 9 4
Sberbank of Russia  Russia 3 4 2 9 4
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. Japan 4 4 1 9 4
La Banque Postale SA France 4 4 1 9 4
Rabobank Netherlands 4 4 0 8 5
HSBC Holdings PLC UK 3 5 0 8 5
Mizuho Financial Group Inc. Japan 4 3 1 8 5
Groupe BPCE France 3 5 0 8 5
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. Japan 3 4 1 8 5
Lloyds Banking Group PLC UK 5 3 0 8 5
Nordea Bank Abp Finland 3 3 1 7 6
ING Groep NV Netherlands 4 3 0 7 6
Commerzbank AG Germany 3 3 1 7 6
Credit Mutuel Group France 3 3 1 7 6
Credit Agricole Group France 3 2 2 7 6
UBS Group AG Switzerland 3 3 1 7 6
CaixaBank SA Spain 3 2 2 7 6
Norinchukin Bank Japan 4 3 0 7 6
Bank of America Corp.  US 2 4 1 7 6
Royal Bank of Canada Canada 3 3 0 6 7
Westpac Banking Corp. Australia 4 2 0 6 7
State Bank of India India 4 2 0 6 7
Itau Unibanco Holding SA Brazil 3 3 0 6 7
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA Italy 2 4 0 6 7
Societe Generale SA France 3 2 1 6 7
Commonwealth Bank of Australia Australia 2 4 0 6 7
Toronto-Dominion Bank Canada 2 4 0 6 7
Barclays PLC UK 3 2 1 6 7
Bank of Nova Scotia Canada 2 4 0 6 7
NatWest Group PLC UK 2 4 0 6 7
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd. Australia 1 4 0 5 8
BNP Paribas SA France 3 2 0 5 8
Deutsche Bank AG Germany 3 2 0 5 8
DZ Bank AG Germany 2 3 0 5 8
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Canada 3 2 0 5 8
Bank of Montreal Canada 2 3 0 5 8
PNC Financial Services Group Inc US 2 2 0 4 9
DBS Group Holdings Ltd. Singapore 2 2 0 4 9
Citigroup Inc. US 1 3 0 4 9
National Australia Bank Ltd. Australia 1 2 0 3 10
JPMorgan Chase & Co. US 1 2 0 3 10
Wells Fargo & Co. US 1 1 0 2 11
Japan Post Bank Japan 1 1 0 2 11
Morgan Stanley US 1 0 0 1 12
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. US 0 0 0 0 13
Capital One Financial Corp. US 0 0 0 0 13
U.S. Bancorp US 0 0 0 0 13

More climate change and net zero: 

Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top