Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Taking the train from Paris to London uses 55% less CO2 than flying

Individuals are most motivated by speed when it comes to travel, but increasingly decisions are being made on the environmental impact of their travel choice, according to data from a survey conducted by travel booking platform Omio. 

Of the 7,000 people from Italy, Spain, Sweden and the UK who were involved in the survey, more than half (58%) recognised that train has the least impact on the environment, but 34% admitted that they still do not consider the environment when making travel decisions.

Money and time remain the key motivators for people when they are choosing their transport options.

At least a third of people said they would be happy to take a bus or a train if it was cheaper, and 52% said they would opt for train or bus if it was quicker.

In order to highlight the benefit of taking a train, Omio has revealed the most popular routes across Europe that are quicker by train than flight.

Taking the train from London to Brussels could reduce the door-to-door travel time by more than three hours compared to flying, and it reduces C02 emissions by 55%.

Similarly, the journey from Paris to London is around 3 hours quicker by train and also generates an energy saving of 55%.

Bertrand Etienne, regional director at Omio said: ‘The common perception that flying is always the fastest way to get from A to B doesn’t necessarily hold true once you consider the additional time required to get to the airport, queue at check-in or security and wait to board or retrieve baggage.

‘In fact, travelling by train or even coach can be just as quick or even quicker.

‘Add to that high-quality accommodation onboard long-distance trains and coaches across Europe, which are generally equipped with comfy seats, refreshments, WiFi, tables and plug sockets, the benefits to the environment and the bigger baggage allowance and it becomes a highly attractive alternative.’

Photo Credit – Pixabay

Pippa Neill
Reporter.

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top